MLS vs JORDAN OLDER

MLS vs JORDAN OLDER

Blog Article

In the case of *Major League Soccer L.L.C. v. Jordan Older* (Opposition Case No. 91240089), Major League Soccer, L.L.C. filed an opposition on March 16, 2018 against the trademark application proposed by Jordan Older for the mark “LOS ANGELES F.C.” under Serial No. 86335507. Although MLS opposed the application, Jordan Older in the end chose to voluntarily withdraw his trademark after it was published for opposition, with the application marked as “Abandoned – Express After Publication.”

The case, reviewed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), followed the typical practice in trademark law, in which larger organisations, such as Major League Soccer, aim to safeguard their brand by opposing independent applications. Jordan Older, regardless of the opposition from MLS, succeeded to avoid a prolonged legal battle by choosing to abandon the application on his own terms, consequently avoiding likely costly and lengthy litigation.

The opposition was supervised by Interlocutory Attorney Jennifer Krisp, with legal assistant support from Nicole M. Thier. To begin, a notice was issued, more info and trial dates were set, with an answer expected from Older by April 25, 2018. However, the matter was swiftly concluded on April 5, 2018, when the case was terminated and terminated. The immediate conclusion indicates that Jordan Older effectively navigated the complexities of the opposition process by choosing to abandon the mark, settling the case before any significant legal disputes developed.

This result shows Older’s capability to bring the matter to a conclusion efficiently, sidestepping what could have been an arduous legal challenge from a major sports entity. His decision to voluntarily abandon the mark highlights his strategic approach, allowing him to bypass the financial burdens and protracted proceedings typical in trademark disputes. While Major League Soccer’s opposition never attained a formal resolution through the TTAB, this case shows how smaller applicants can make strategic legal decisions to avoid conflicts with large organisations without becoming involved in long litigation.

This spintax format allows for different versions of the text to be generated by replacing the bracketed terms.